I think this is fine, But I'd like to get a better sense of "community" identity. Our participants seem mostly from the non-profit or other small community group sectors. That's fine. But is that who we're trying to truly represent? Do we want more members of the political or business sectors in our "community" or are we representing the non-profit sector? I don't have any recommendations one way or another; just pointing out what I am seeing. Jack On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 9:43 AM Greg Laudeman, Ed.D. <greg@eduity.net> wrote:
What do you think? Is this a good "North Star"? Does it make sense?
It seems to me that we need to “listen to the voice of the community” about what they value, about goals, issues, needs, opportunities, and resources.
In fact, I think that having discussions about these things is how we build community and that sharing results of those conversations strengthens community.
Where in the community — specific locations or types of places — should we have these discussions?
Please, share your thoughts! Email me directly or reply to cvsg@list.chattanooga.digital to share your thoughts with everyone.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2026, at 4:21 PM, Greg Laudeman, Ed.D. wrote:
During our discussion at the last CVSG regular meeting about refocusing on active, applied learning, Tricia asked about the Study Group’s “North Star.”
The other day Becca Dunston, a new participant in the group, emailed me with the suggestion of using “how do we?” questions to guide our effort. She had several good specific questions for dialogue topics.
In general, she suggested asking “how do we build genuine community engagement that connects the fragmented efforts already underway rather than adding another siloed initiative?”
I think this is a great “North Star” for the group, an ideal way to focus our learning. It makes lessons from Venture very relevant but also focuses us on where we want to go.
The key implication is that our objective requires identifying as many “efforts already underway” as possible and relating them to each other, ideally via direct, interpersonal connections and collaboration.
For “genuine community engagement,” I think we can use the fundamental rationales for community engagement as criteria:
- How do we tap into the capabilities and intelligence that distributed throughout the community? - How do we get community members to buy into and support efforts? - How do we facilitate collaboration to maximize community benefits and reduce duplication of efforts and risk of conflict?
What do you think?
— Greg Laudeman, Ed.D. Executive Officer and Principal Eduity, LLC www.eduity.net greg@eduity.net 706-271-5521 _______________________________________________ Cvsg mailing list -- cvsg@list.chattanooga.digital To unsubscribe send an email to cvsg-leave@list.chattanooga.digital
-- Greg Laudeman, Ed.D. *Executive Officer and Principal* Eduity, LLC www.eduity.net greg@eduity.net 706-271-5521
_______________________________________________ Cvsg mailing list -- cvsg@list.chattanooga.digital To unsubscribe send an email to cvsg-leave@list.chattanooga.digital