Yeah, that’s more of a side-effect for how meeting requests work in Next Cloud, it doesn’t care that I’m logged in – that link is still taking me to the advisory e-mail (and so everyone is just stepping on each other’s submissions).

Those invite links have to be personalized per e-mail, you should have another invitee e-mail which should use your e-mail correctly.

Thanks,

William Roush | https://www.roushtech.net/ | 423.933.2114

Office: 423.933.2114 x1000 | Cell: 423.463.0592 | Email: william.roush@roushtech.net

Book a meeting: https://cal.roushtech.net/william.roush

From: Rob Aitchison via Advisors <advisors@list.chattanooga.digital>
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2026 10:31
To: Greg Laudeman <greg.laudeman@chattanooga.digital>
Cc: C.D Advisors <advisors@list.chattanooga.digital>
Subject: [Advisors] Re: Meet about IAM evaluation

Hi Greg,

I just went and completed this and it appears to have captured my responses as the advisors list user instead of my identity. I clicked the link in this email to perform the operation.

Now that's an interesting bug, ironic as it shows the need for bullet-proof identity.

Talk to you soon, thanks.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Wednesday, September 2nd, 2026 at 3:55 PM, Greg Laudeman via Advisors <advisors@list.chattanooga.digital> wrote:

OK, so we have at least one victim... I mean *volunteer* 😁... for this. We had a good initial discussion on our weekly devops call.

For those interested, when might be a good time to meet? My general sense is that "over lunch" or right "after work" are best, especially cuz I'm not a morning person.

I created a meeting request via Nextcloud, which hopefully you got an email to select a good time, based on that. Let me know if you didn't and/or if there are other better times for such meetings.

IMPORTANT NOTE: You must scroll/zoom the window to the lower right hand corner to find the "Submit" button. It's partially obscured by the branding message (which we need to remove/replace).

On 9/1/26 12:50 PM, Greg Laudeman wrote:

On 8/27/26 3:50 PM, Greg Laudeman wrote:

Who would be willing help evaluate software for members and/or use for internal purposes? We also need some standard practices, procedures, and tools for this purpose.

FYI, here's a great article on these very topics: https://startwithidentity.com/articles/top-10-open-source-iam-solutions/

The site is a "vendor-neutral reference for the whole field: workforce IAM, CIAM, privileged access, identity governance, zero trust, and passwordless" so a good topical resource.

Anyone interested in trying some of these out?